Once Upon a Time...in Hollywood (2019)
California Dreaming
But, the man can do what he wants. And if what he wants is to bow out after film #10, kick back and watch movies on 35mm for the rest of his days, then he’s earned the right to do so.
Still, this would have been a great 10th film to go out on.
Once Upon a Time…is multilayered, exuberant yet restrained, exciting yet suspenseful. A joyous and nostalgic love letter to late 1960’s Hollywood. A Hollywood on the brink of transformation. The old studio fare wasn’t making money and the ‘Movie Brats’ of the 1970’s, such luminaries as Spielberg, Scorsese, Lucas, Coppola, DePalma and Milius, were about to change everything forever, taking the power away from studio moguls and putting it into the hands of the filmmakers themselves, giving them unprecedented creative control, which would lead to some of the biggest movie moneymakers in film history.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0a4c/b0a4c7bd20fb03d29fee3d636395f223689e4766" alt=""
The final third of the film is dedicated to Sharon Tate, radiating unforced sexuality and played with boundless adorability by Margot Robbie. We all know the story of Sharon Tate and what befell her and some of her friends on the evening of August 8th in 1969, an event that sent an electric shock of panic surging throughout Los Angeles and the entire film industry. The fact of this tragedy taking place in and around the time this story takes place, laces the film with an undercurrent of dread and a level of anticipatory anxiety, even in one of the movie’s many comedic moments.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a196/1a196251c1c98507828b7f69eeae20b84e16ebab" alt=""
In the oeuvre of Tarantino’s filmography, Once Upon a Time represents one of the most noticeable moments of his filmmaking evolution. And I don’t mean that the snappy dialogue is so much snappier, or that the blood is so much more gruesome. Truth be told, the evolution apparent in this film is the willingness of Tarantino to ease off of the pop cultural gas petal and blatant fetishism of hyper violence that has trademarked most of the rest of his catalogue. This film is very focused on not violating the terms of its period. That means that unlike, say, Django Unchained, where you have James Brown and 2Pac tunes thumping overtop a former black slave shooting racist whites in 1850’s Antebellum, here, all the music you hear is music you would have heard on one station or another, or one record player or another in Hollywood in 1969. It also means that the characters don’t speak in pop shop dialogue, and there aren’t really any major monologue moments, like the ones that often open Tarantino’s films. Most notably Christoph Waltz’s Oscar winning soliloquy at the beginning of Inglourious Basterds, going on and on about tasty milk and Jewish rats and German hawks. Here, Tarantino lets the story be the star and has the actors service the story, not the words coming out of their mouths.
And the acting is uniformly fantastic. There are really only three major roles, but there are a whole host of Hollywood character actors, a-listers, bonafide legends, b-movie bit players and ‘whatever happened to’s that jump in and out of the movie with a line here or a moment there. And in true Hollywood fashion, this makes perfect sense.
And the acting is uniformly fantastic. There are really only three major roles, but there are a whole host of Hollywood character actors, a-listers, bonafide legends, b-movie bit players and ‘whatever happened to’s that jump in and out of the movie with a line here or a moment there. And in true Hollywood fashion, this makes perfect sense.
And in true Hollywood fashion, this movie, in all of its dizzying displays of filmmaking bravura and its multiple storylines snaking in and out of each other like a Los Angeles expressway at rush hour, make perfect sense. It feels like what it is: the culmination of a movie geek turned movie god’s 27 year career paying homage to the films of his life. But also to the place those films were made and the people who made them. Tarantino, like most people who find their way to the City of Angels looking for fame and fortune, is a Hollywood transplant. Born and raised in Knoxville, Tennessee, not under the W of the Hollywood sign, as one would expect. But he has made the town his own and siphoned from it every drop of talent and inspiration it has to offer.
Once Upon A Time in Hollywood may not be his best film, but it is the best example of the gift Hollywood has given him in his time there. And it is the best gift that he could give it in return.
Once Upon A Time in Hollywood may not be his best film, but it is the best example of the gift Hollywood has given him in his time there. And it is the best gift that he could give it in return.
Rating: *****
Comments
Post a Comment